OCZ Vector 150 240GB Review

Written by Matthew Lambert

January 8, 2014 | 08:41

Tags: #barefoot-3 #imft #ocz-bankruptcy #ocz-vector #ssd #vector

Companies: #micron #ocz #ocz-technologies #ocz-technology #toshiba

PCMark 7

Website: PCMark 7

PCMark 7's storage benchmark uses SATA traces to emulate specific workloads and apply them to each SSD on test. We've selected the Gaming and Application load tests to highlight here. As some PCMark tests generate the same result regardless of SSD, we feel these speeds are more relevant than PCMark's overall score.

PCMark 7 Secondary Storage Test

Gaming Test

  • Samsung SSD 840 Evo 1TB (Rapid Mode)
  • Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB
  • Samsung SSD 840 Evo 500GB
  • Samsung SSD 840 Evo 120GB
  • Samsung SSD 840 250GB
  • Crucial M500 480GB
  • OCZ Vector 256GB
  • SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB
  • OCZ Vector 150 240GB
  • OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
  • OCZ Vertex 450 256GB
    • 18.49
    • 17.56
    • 17.46
    • 17.37
    • 17.13
    • 17.01
    • 16.97
    • 16.91
    • 16.82
    • 16.70
    • 16.65
0
5
10
15
20
MB/sec (higher is better)
  • Speed (MB/sec)

PCMark 7 Secondary Storage Test

Gaming Test (Raw Result)

  • Samsung SSD 840 Evo 1TB (Rapid Mode)
  • Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB
  • Samsung SSD 840 Evo 500GB
  • Samsung SSD 840 Evo 120GB
  • Samsung SSD 840 250GB
  • Crucial M500 480GB
  • OCZ Vector 256GB
  • SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB
  • OCZ Vector 150 240GB
  • OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
  • OCZ Vertex 450 256GB
  • Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB
    • 382.83
    • 159.17
    • 151.73
    • 144.78
    • 129.68
    • 123.22
    • 119.93
    • 117.01
    • 113.80
    • 108.95
    • 106.34
    • 99.93
0
100
200
300
400
MB/sec (higher is better)
  • Speed (MB/sec)

PCMark 7 Secondary Storage Test

Starting Applications Test

  • Samsung SSD 840 Evo 1TB (Rapid Mode)
  • Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB
  • Samsung SSD 840 Evo 500GB
  • Samsung SSD 840 250GB
  • Samsung SSD 840 Evo 120GB
  • OCZ Vector 256GB
  • OCZ Vector 150 240GB
  • OCZ Vertex 450 256GB
  • SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB
  • OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
  • Crucial M500 480GB
    • 94.54
    • 67.02
    • 60.97
    • 59.70
    • 58.89
    • 58.58
    • 57.65
    • 55.68
    • 55.67
    • 53.19
    • 52.26
0
25
50
75
100
MB/sec (higher is better)
  • Speed (MB/sec)

PCMark 7 Secondary Storage Test

Starting Applications Test (Raw Result)

  • Samsung SSD 840 Evo 1TB (Rapid Mode)
  • Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB
  • Samsung SSD 840 Evo 500GB
  • Samsung SSD 840 250GB
  • Samsung SSD 840 Evo 120GB
  • OCZ Vector 256GB
  • OCZ Vector 150 240GB
  • OCZ Vertex 450 256GB
  • SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB
  • OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
  • Crucial M500 480GB
  • Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB
    • 475.58
    • 137.57
    • 114.28
    • 109.92
    • 107.19
    • 106.04
    • 103.15
    • 97.02
    • 96.15
    • 89.70
    • 87.07
    • 77.46
0
100
200
300
400
500
MB/sec (higher is better)
  • Speed (MB/sec)

BootRacer

Website: BootRacer

We've wanted to include more real-world tests for our SSD reviews, and BootRacer allows us to accuratly time Windows 7 64-bit reboot times down to hundredths of a second. We run the test on a fresh install of Windows 7 64-bit on the relevant SSD, first allowing five restarts to allow Windows 7 to get its caching together, before taking the average of the five subsequent reboot times as our result.

BootRacer Restart Time

Restart time

  • OCZ Vector 256GB
  • Samsung SSD 840 Evo 500GB
  • OCZ Vector 150 240GB
  • Samsung SSD 840 Evo 120GB
  • SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB
  • OCZ Vertex 450 256GB
  • Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB
  • Crucial M500 480GB
  • Corsair Neutron GTX 480GB
  • OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
  • Samsung SSD 840 250GB
    • 9.14
    • 9.40
    • 9.63
    • 9.76
    • 9.76
    • 9.87
    • 9.98
    • 10.20
    • 10.22
    • 10.47
    • 10.67
0
3
5.5
8
10.5
Seconds (lower is better)
  • Restart time (sec)

Read out performance analysis.
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04